Project studio/music room - construction phase

Discuss studios designed and built by others.

Moderators: Aaronw, John Sayers

kominak
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 10:24 pm
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia, EU

Re: Project studio/music room - construction phase

Post by kominak »

Yes, length same as the poly. I think you'll need to go deeper than just 1cm. Try with whatever scrap pieces you have laying around right now,. Anything will do, even if not rounded. Just stick them on with bits of duct tape temporarily, to see if they have the desired effect.
I tried this with some quarter-round planks, that I glued together to form half rounds (4.5cm wide, 2.2cm deep). Here's the result:

BEFORE:
Without_planks_R.jpg
AFTER:
With_planks_R.jpg
The reflections are still there, they are just much smaller. Would rebuilding the polys to "d" or "e" curve help me to achieve significantly better results?

Martin
Soundman2020
Site Admin
Posts: 11938
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Re: Project studio/music room - construction phase

Post by Soundman2020 »

Let's see the actual MDAT... :)
The reflections are still there, they are just much smaller.
Yup! So the concept is correct... maybe just not the dimensions... However, you did get a pretty good reduction there.


- Stuart -
kominak
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 10:24 pm
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia, EU

Re: Project studio/music room - construction phase

Post by kominak »

Let's see the actual MDAT... :)
Of course - here you go...

There are 4 measurements: 2 for L and 2 for R speaker, both with and without planks.
kominak
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 10:24 pm
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia, EU

Re: Project studio/music room - construction phase

Post by kominak »

I see the total count of the views is closing on 10.000 and I haven’t updated the status in a while. The progress slowed down a little as I had to go back to work after 4 months, but this is how the studio looked like at the end of the year:
front1.jpg
back1.jpg
left1.jpg
right1.jpg
I re-did the vertical poly diffusers to be of ‘D’-type curve:
poly-and-non-poly-cylindrical-buckled_end_constraints-shapes.jpg
This helped with the reflections I was dealing with in the previous posts.
kominak
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 10:24 pm
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia, EU

Re: Project studio/music room - construction phase

Post by kominak »

In the meantime I started to work with Stuart on the digital tuning, as he agreed the room was treated well enough / was ready for this next step. I wanted to process with the tuning before finishing the room with the fabric in case there would still be some additional treatment needed.

In the process Stuart noticed there’s still some flutter echo in the room. After analyzing the room (read: clapping and jumping around ) I noticed these were the problem areas(red):
left1_areas.jpg
The green ones are OK, because these parts of the walls are angled.
Because the room is very small and the space is at premium, I decided to try dealing with the flutter and effectively using the space at the same time. Two horizontal diffusers, guitar cases, a bookshelf and a small combo amp strategically placed in the problem areas:
left2.jpg
right2.jpg
It worked quite well and there’s no flutter noticeable anywhere in the room now. At the same time it’s now furnished like I’d like it to be and I have everything I need close at hand.

Hopefully the end of digital tuning process is near and I'll be able to share the results.
Gregwor
Moderator
Posts: 1501
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:03 pm
Location: St. Albert, Alberta, Canada

Re: Project studio/music room - construction phase

Post by Gregwor »

Even with just exposed insulation, it looks gorgeous! Great work dude!

Greg
It appears that you've made the mistake most people do. You started building without consulting this forum.
kominak
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 10:24 pm
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia, EU

Re: Project studio/music room - construction phase

Post by kominak »

Thank you, Greg!

My daughter's friend (9yo) commented: what a cozy little room!
I'm tempted to leave it as it is :)
kominak
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 10:24 pm
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia, EU

Re: Project studio/music room - construction phase

Post by kominak »

This has been one fast ride! For the last one and half month Stuart and I worked on the digital tuning of this small room. We exchanged emails almost daily, sometimes several times a day and now the room is finally ready. I'll leave it to Stuart to present and explain the graphs, I just want to comment on some small acoustic treatment bits that were added in the process of digital tuning.
There was a big dip (>20dB) in the frequency response at around 130Hz. It was not noticeable when listening to the speakers, but still the measurement showed there was some problem and with Stuart's assistance we found out it was a floor bounce. That's why there are those small towers of mineral wool on both sides of the mixing desk and also the angled plywood/mineral wool panel under the desk (kind of inverted ceiling cloud):
front_stitch_small.jpg
These solved the issue, now I only need to find a way to make them less ugly :) (and to cover the mineral wool with fabric panels to make the room more presentable...)

This whole process showed me that digital tuning is an amazing tool in the hands of an expert. And if it goes hand in hand with acoustic treatment of the room, of course. The results are much better than I dared to believe given how small the room and how unlucky the dimension ratio is (2:1:1)...

Big thanks to this amazing forum (and John and Stuart)!

Martin
kominak
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 10:24 pm
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia, EU

Re: Project studio/music room - construction phase

Post by kominak »

The tuning process is finished, so I'd like to share some graphs to show how this whole adventure ended (this is excerpt from Stuart's mail, he might want to chime in with some more comments):

Frequency response is now flat to within +/- 2.4 dB across the entire spectrum, 28 Hz to 21 kHz (1/24 octave smoothing):
FR_smoothed_1_24.png
And even better when smoothed to 1/3 octave, as required for international specs:
FR_smoothed_1_3.png
At that scale, we are getting +/-1.2 dB. For example, ITU BS.1116-3 requires +/-3 dB, and even then it's only from 250 Hz to 2 kHz... we get +/- 1.2 dB across the entire spectrum.

The Left and Right channels are within +/- 0.9 dB across the spectrum (1/3 octave smoothing). The same specification as above requires +/- 2 dB:
LR_speakers.png
The waterfall below 500 Hz is very smooth and flat:
waterfall.png
And the spectrogram shows the same: smooth and flat across the entire low end:
spectogram.png

After this the "house curve" was applied to make the speakers/room system sound more natural (more like our ears are used to hear things):
house_curve.png
The blue curve is the "flat" response, and the purple curve is with Stuart's House Curve applied You can see the slight bass boost and treble cut...
It took me some time to get used to it, but now I wouldn't get back to flat response.

Big thanks to Stuart for helping me making this a reality!

Martin
Gregwor
Moderator
Posts: 1501
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 6:03 pm
Location: St. Albert, Alberta, Canada

Re: Project studio/music room - construction phase

Post by Gregwor »

Great work! Crazy good results! What processor are you using for eq?

Greg
It appears that you've made the mistake most people do. You started building without consulting this forum.
Soundman2020
Site Admin
Posts: 11938
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Santiago, Chile
Contact:

Re: Project studio/music room - construction phase

Post by Soundman2020 »

FBQ-2496, but it's crazy finicky to get right, and the manual is next to useless. There's also MIDI communications problems with REW that cause the data to not upload correctly sometimes... at random.... It does the EQ job fine, but I don' recommend it unless you are prepared to sit through the pain of trying to make it play nicely....

- Stuart -
Post Reply