i was wondering about the fact of using egg crates
what would be the results if it's filled with concrete ?
i donno but i thought that i might have more reflection on high freq and much bass absorb
is that true
yes with fiberglass or foam 100% coverage is to much, because absorption coefficients are to high especially above 500hz, basically 1.00 , but I still believe that with a different material or combination of materials with lower NRC it is possible.AVare wrote:
Yes it is. People have been writing here continually that it is too much, and provide little diffusion.
Andre
Hi Glenn , I like your picture,myfipie wrote:Wow, did I start all of this by pointing out about the egg crates?![]()
![]()
![]()
Bruce I am glad to see you post you would not use them now, nor would recommend using them. It is hard enough to teach people to use the right stuff these days and with a background like yours, when you talk people listen.![]()
![]()
Glenn
Sculli wrote:Mr Swedien,
First off, let me say how thrilling it is to have your expertise on this forum!
Second, I offer my Greatest Appreciation to you and all the pioneers who
experimented (egg carton or crates,bathrooms etc etc.....)and brought us
new sounds that have changed the way we listen to and create music. I have
your book and it gave me great insight about recording. I didn't know you
were in on so many records that I love! Thanks Bruce! I hope I can stay as
excited about recording as you.
Peace,
Kevin

MMazurek wrote:Thanks for your generosity of time, Mr. Swedien.
What are your reasons and favorite uses for the tube traps?
Are there any specific uses where they just shine?
I've only used them at Wireworld Studio in Nashville on one session (with Michael Wagener). We used them to create a 'less roomy' lead vocal space in a medium sized room, and to disrupt early reflections around the drums.
How bout you?
Mark

timogiodeson wrote:I especially believe in the scientist that make them , Mr Noxon is a very generous man .
I believe in Mr Noxon.
