I'm getting a little lost in all the calculations... But here's how to figure it in a nutshell.
Figure 2.3 pounds per square foot per layer of 5/8" sheet rock. If you're using 4 layers, you're looking at 9.2 pounds per square foot, plus the weight of the framing.
I'm assuming your walls are not bearing any weight above them -- that no amount of pressure will be placed on your top plates. This would require that the tops of your walls actually be a wee bit
below the ceiling joists.
Just for fun, let's suppose that including framing, you have 20 linear feat of wall that weighs 1,600 pounds. That's 80 pounds per linear foot.
It appears you're using 2x4 construction, which means your soleplates are 3 1/2" wide. One linear foot has a "footprint" of 12" x 3 1/2". Multiply 12 by 3.5 and you end up with 42. That's the number of square inches that your linear foot occupies on the floor.
Your 80 pounds is sitting on 42 square inches. That's just less than 2 pounds per square inch.
Imagine a tiny piece of your Neoprene rubber that's cut to 1" x 1" (by whatever thickness it is -- 1/2" maybe?). Now imagine putting a two pound weight on it. Do you think that Neoprene piece will compress 10-15%?
No way. It would probably require 20 times that, maybe 30 or 40 times that. (I'm just guessing here.

)
So, clearly, your rubber is severely
undercompressed. What's the big deal? An undercompressed elastomer doesn't bounce, and if it doesn't bounce,
it may as well not be there.
The reason elastomers are typically cut into "pucks" isn't so much to save material -- it's to decrease the surface area on the elastomer so as to increase the amount of weight per puck, so as to allow it to act as the spring it is meant to be.
Back when I intended to float a floor on my project (I have since decided
not to float), I paid a machine shop to test some 1/2" thick 60 durometer EPDM rubber.
Here are the results. Learn from the tests I paid $300 for.
Again,
you cannot afford to crapshoot this part of your plan. Mess this up, and you could end up with a
worse result than if you hadn't attempted to float anything at all.
I welcome any corrections to my mathematics or logic... But whatever the case, you have to calculate the weights and you have to know how much your elastomer will compress.
Oh, one more thing. Don't assume that if a 1" square of Neoprene can compress a certain amount under a certain weight that you can use simple multiplication to figure a larger piece with a proportional amount of weight to get the same amount of compression.
That is not true. What makes Neoprene act as a spring is its ability to squish out on the sides. The larger the piece, the
disportionately more weight it takes to compress by the same amount. This is due to the
decreased ratio of edge surface area to top/bottom surface area. There is a technical term for this but I don't remember what it is. In other words, there is no "universal" compression test for Neoprene -- the compression rate depends on the size of the puck.
Hope that helps...
--Keith
