Bummer...
If Stuart gets me the details on the slats over the doors today, I should have some pics of that over the weekend...nothing else for me to do at the moment.
Looks like it should be OK, but do round the edges that face towards the speaker itself: Sharp edges are sources of edge diffraction. OK, yes, that trim is a long way off from the acoustic center, and out at 90° off axis, so there's not much going on there at mids and highs, you'd think, but there's still something, and there's always reflections and the diffuse field to deal with. I think I've mentioned this before, but if you can do ten things in your studio that each make a difference of 0.5 dB, then you made a difference of 5 dB!Here is the trim I was planning on doing around the baffles. Need to make sure it won't cause any issues.
I've been in bed with the flu the entire weekend since Friday, thus not very responsive. This insulation is fairly important, as these two slot walls are aimed at fairly low frequencies, so we need stuff that has high coefficients of absorption in the low-mid and low frequency range. 701 and 703 do. So do some others, but it's hard to say for sure if what you have is the right stuff without knowing what the exact acoustic characteristics are. If you have a link to the acoustic specs page for the product you have on hand, and it shows numbers around 0.5 or higher at 125 Hz, then you should be OK. I show 3" in the model, but if you need to go 3.5" to get that, then that's fine too.That's what I'm asking about. I can't get rigid insulation till Tuesday next week. Wanting to know if it has to be rigid, cause I'll have to wait till then to do the final assembly. Sorry if I'm getting on your nerves, but I need to know.
Not sure yet. For the cloud, you'll need about 50 ft2 of 3". Perhaps something similar to the above, but I'm thinking of going with an FRK or FSK: Johns Mansville IS 600 FSK would be great, if you can get it! It only comes in 2", I think, but we could put 2" of that with the FSK side down (facing the room) and an inch of something else above it (701, pink fluffy, etc). Ottawa Fiber OFI-48 FSK would also be good, but also comes only in 2". The best: 3" OC-705 FRK would be excellent. All of those have good absorption in the low end, but less in the mids and highs, due to the facing, which is exactly what we want up there. We'll use a thicker fabric (or maybe thin carpet) just under your finish fabric, to take the edge off the very high end, which is still a bit bright in your room as compared to the low mids, but the cloud is mostly going to do some more for the low end, as well as deal with some reflections.Also, can you give me a heads up on any special insulation I'm going to need for the rest of the project? All we have left is the cloud and the wall under the window after the slats I think. getting special insulation takes a few hours round trip and I'd like to make it just one if need be.
Thanks for the kind words, Jakob! Your room will be able to turn out something like this, for sure! I'm ready to put the final touches to the design for you.... as soon as you are ready!This is really impressive work. The graphs speaks for themselves +/- 0.6 db is insanely hard to achieve. And the aesthetics of the room is just marvellous. Really really impressive !!
According to the data sheet, 703 2" FRK has a coefficient of .63 down at 125 Hz...So, I can use some combination of 703 FRK and un-faced to achieve the results.