which of this is the best option to record?
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:16 am
Well..
I've been seen some mixers, interfaces, and multi-track recorders..
also, i talk with a friend of mine, who have one of the best recording studios (for rock, metal, etc) in this country (Mexico)..
He used to record a mackie mixer (30 channels) and a interfaz digidesign pro tools 002..
i was just to buy a multitrack recorder (Korg D3200 i have not enough money to afford some better, or not for now)
so.. i really need some help to that.. which is better?
a multi-track recorder, which no needs for interfaces (i guess) or a mixer which doesn't record track per track, needs an interfaz but can has a lot of more channels to record
Of course, i'm open to any tip for the equipement i should bought.. but consider i care A LOT about the esthetic of this studio-proyect and among more professional it look, it will be so much better..
Thanks a lot..
I really appreciate your attention
I've been seen some mixers, interfaces, and multi-track recorders..
also, i talk with a friend of mine, who have one of the best recording studios (for rock, metal, etc) in this country (Mexico)..
He used to record a mackie mixer (30 channels) and a interfaz digidesign pro tools 002..
i was just to buy a multitrack recorder (Korg D3200 i have not enough money to afford some better, or not for now)
so.. i really need some help to that.. which is better?
a multi-track recorder, which no needs for interfaces (i guess) or a mixer which doesn't record track per track, needs an interfaz but can has a lot of more channels to record
Of course, i'm open to any tip for the equipement i should bought.. but consider i care A LOT about the esthetic of this studio-proyect and among more professional it look, it will be so much better..
Thanks a lot..
I really appreciate your attention