Hi, i'm considering (planning) starting a rehearsal rooms business, and I'm basically wondering if full studio standard isloation is nescessary, as no recording will be taking place in the rooms.
I was planning on contructing the rooms with the 'room within a room' design, apart from the floor, as floating the floors would be too expensive.
But then I was thinking that I could just beef up any existing rooms, and/or build new rooms that would be in contact with the existing structure.
I would be using timber partitions with double layers of plasterboard, and rockwool etc. But would you think that total isolation is needed or not?
Thanks a million, Barry.
Is decoupling nescessary for REHEARSAL rooms?
-
crowbar0
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:32 am
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
-
sharward
- Moderator
- Posts: 4281
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 4:08 pm
- Location: Sacramento, Northern California, USA
- Contact:
Funny how I was able to quickly locate this particular needle in the haystack of this forum -- I happened to remember the word "confusion" that Steve emphasized in his response, so I just searched for all posts by "knightfly" including the word "confusion."Back in February 2005, knightfly wrote:. . . one reason for better low frequency isolation . . . is CONFUSION . . . have you ever tried to play in tempo with a group when ANOTHER room had a boom-box or stereo going, and gotten confused when you tried to stay on the beat? This can be a real downer with adjacent practice rooms . . . (source)
Anyway, there's your answer: investing in room-to-room isolation is good, even if only for rehearsal purposes.
-
crowbar0
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:32 am
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
The rooms themselves would be decoupled from each other, thats a given.
What i'm wondering about is decoupling from the actual shell structure of the building.
i.e. if I build a fully decoupled room (room within a room), would that be hugely more effective than if I used an existing wall or two and then just section it off with framing, insulation and plasterboard?
What i'm wondering about is decoupling from the actual shell structure of the building.
i.e. if I build a fully decoupled room (room within a room), would that be hugely more effective than if I used an existing wall or two and then just section it off with framing, insulation and plasterboard?
-
crowbar0
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:32 am
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
-
knightfly
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6976
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:11 am
- Location: West Coast, USA
Barry, this
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3231
Is there for a good reason; following ALL the bold points will answer most of your questions... Steve
http://www.johnlsayers.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3231
Is there for a good reason; following ALL the bold points will answer most of your questions... Steve
Soooo, when a Musician dies, do they hear the white noise at the end of the tunnel??!? Hmmmm...