The data that never seems to get mentioned with respect to absorbers is their absorption coefficient (efficiency) in their respective bandwidth. Of course, you can build a panel absorber with whatever resonant frequency you like. 10Hz? No problem! But in order to do this you need a very massive panel. Massive panels have more inertia and are, therefore, more difficult to excite. More difficult to excite translates to less efficient. The only way to make a highly efficient panel absorber is to use a very light panel in conjunction with a very deep cavity. In other words you need a lot of space.
There's no getting around it. If you want to absorb low frequencies, you need space. Absorbent hangers just help maximize the efficiency of a given space.
How big is massive? I suppose the larger the panel the lighter and thinner it needs to be. Is there a formula for working out the optimum dimensions for a given frequency?
In such a small space(less than a meter squared) would I be better off with panel traps?
Nice post Barefoot - I agree completely.
Oliver - you have a lot of wasted space in your setup, what I mean by that is below say 4' you can't use the space for anything other than trapping. In your case I'd look at hangers or slots or both.