Treatment for very small control room

Plans and things, layout, style, where do I put my near-fields etc.

Moderators: Aaronw, kendale, John Sayers

bolehnggak
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Indonesia
Contact:

Treatment for very small control room

Post by bolehnggak »

Hi all. New to this list. Hope that I can share some insight from experts like you all.
I have a home studio, and I'm thinking of redesigning the control room, cause I'm not happy with its sound.
The control room is 3,5m wide, 2,9 long, and 3,2 m high.
On the 3,5m wide wall, at the center, there is a sealed window to the main studio room. When I'm monitoring, I face the window, so the control room layout is wider to the side instead to the front. Hope you get the picture.
The treatment is just foams on every walls, and carpet on the floor.

Any suggestion of treatment, considering how small this room is?

I read some articles about good proportion room for music, and I'm thinking of lowering the ceiling, so the height would be 2,6 m, and the room proportion would be 1:1,14:1,39. Is it a good idea?

Thanks in advance.
Ari
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by John Sayers »

Ari - your main problem is that you have no low end absorption in your room. The foam will absorb down to 500hz if you are lucky - below that nothing.

Check out the SAE site http://www.saecollege.de/reference_material/index.html and check out absorbers - low-mid and low.

Your ceiling height is good so I'd look at maybe putting some hangers in it.

cheers
JOhn[/code]
bolehnggak
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Indonesia
Contact:

Post by bolehnggak »

Thanks John. I checked that site, and download the absorbers articles for reference.
I'm fairly new at this. Could you describe what hanger is, what is it look like, how to install it, how high from the original ceiling, etc.?

Ari
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by John Sayers »

You can see them as they were used in left bank here: http://johnlsayers.com/Studio/Pages/update_4.htm

That's how imagine you could use them in your ceiling :)

cheers
john
bolehnggak
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Indonesia
Contact:

Post by bolehnggak »

Thanks. I already checked the update 4, and it seems that the hangers were placed above the ceiling frame, so it will be covered with some sort of ceiling panels if I'm not mistaken?
So if I'm going to use hangers, the ceiling would be lowered, right?

Ari
bolehnggak
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Indonesia
Contact:

Post by bolehnggak »

Here's the drawing of the control room.
As you can see, the room has double brick walls. And the right side of the control room is a wood frame with 1/4" plywoods attached. Then every walls are covered with vinyl covered foams, standard industrial foams, not specialised foams for acoustic treatment. All floors are carpeted.
I'm thinking of putting diffusor over the sofa, and probably some absorbers on the side walls, but still not sure.
Any suggestion of treatments are welcome.

Ari
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by John Sayers »

bolehnggak wrote: As you can see, the room has double brick walls. And the right side of the control room is a wood frame with 1/4" plywoods attached. Then every walls are covered with vinyl covered foams, standard industrial foams, not specialised foams for acoustic treatment. All floors are carpeted.
I'm thinking of putting diffusor over the sofa, and probably some absorbers on the side walls, but still not sure.
Any suggestion of treatments are welcome.

Ari
Ari - the treatment you have is effecting the high end only, except that the 1/4" plywood would probably be acting as a low frequency panel absorber.

You basically need some low-mid absorption to balance out all the high freq absorption. BTW industrial foam and acoustic foam are two different products.

One wall you haven't mentioned is the ceiling - in small rooms the ceiling is a good place to get some absorption going without effecting your floorspace.

cheers
john
bolehnggak
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Indonesia
Contact:

Post by bolehnggak »

The ceilings are 3.18m high, made of 1/4" plywoods also, but without acoustic consideration. The room was made with minimal knowledge of acoustics, although the double wall construction really blocks the sound.
I'm thinking of redesigning, but since the brick walls are hard to tear down, and not to mention more money involved, probably the only adjustment I can make is the inside of the control room, and moving the 1/4" plywood wall on the right side of the control room.
Here's a drawing of my trial design. The green lines are going to be slot absorbers, and the pink lines, are just cloth. What do you think?

Ari
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by John Sayers »

With a 3.1m ceiling I'd use some of that space for hangers.

cheers
john
bolehnggak
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Indonesia
Contact:

Post by bolehnggak »

Thanks for your comments, John. I really appreciate them.
About hangers, the SAE site doesn't provide infos on hanger's size, materials, how many and where to place it in, in this case, my control room, etc. Do you know where can I obtain those infos?
And, just a thought, what if I use bass traps instead of acoustic hanger on the ceiling? I read an Ethan Winer's article on bass trap which are mounted on the ceiling.

Ari
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by John Sayers »

you can use either Ari - the main thing is to get an even reverb time at all frequencies so some form of bass trapping will be required.

cheers
john
bolehnggak
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Indonesia
Contact:

Post by bolehnggak »

Ok. What do you think about the layout design I sent, with the slot absorber? Any suggestion for better treatment?

Ari
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by John Sayers »

Your layout is fine - I'm not sure what you mean by 'just cloth' for the pink lines. I assume you mean cloth over 703 type insulation.

cheers
john
bolehnggak
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: Indonesia
Contact:

Post by bolehnggak »

Yes, with 703 insulations, if I can find them, it's rather scarce here. If I can't find the 703s here, what substitute can I use for treatment?
BTW I'm still thinking of another design, which might be cheaper and doesn't waste a lot of space, it's already a small room. What do you suggest?

Ari
John Sayers
Site Admin
Posts: 5462
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2003 12:46 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by John Sayers »

If you can't find a rigid fibreglass equivalent then you can use rockwool.
What different design did you have in mind??

cheers
john
Post Reply