Haha! Well, yes, it has serious issues, BUT... is the glass half full, or is it half empty? The room is already built.Soundman2020 wrote:I agree that as a room, it LOOKS great, and would no doubt be a pleasure to work in! But as a studio, it has serious issues.
- Stuart -
By the way, I recovered my old name ... just used "ejb" until I could figure out what happened to my old data after my move. I've actually been a member here for several years. My life has been in constant flux. Anyway, I'm back, and you'll see this avatar & user name from now on. Once this thread is finished (no more traffic for a while), I'll deactivate my old name. John says it will erase this thread, unfortunately.
Anyway, my point is this: the room is built. And painted & trimmed. After the huge task of building, we are already scraping the bottom of the financial bucket. If I continue to make major changes now, I will not have the equipment I want. So, whether or not the room is "usable" is now a historic question. I HAVE to assume that it is. So the next question is, where do I go from here?
Thank you all for the positive comments. It was a lot of work! [Yes, the drum room is ALSO octagonal in shape; however, that room will be much less a problem, because I'm setting it up as a semianechoic chamber. I am presently installing 10 inches (thick) of insulation on ALL wall surfaces. The ceiling will be outfitted with diffusers. I will also build some mobile reflective diffuser units to add to the drum room walls when I want something more reflective. Directly next to the drum sitting position, I have built a simple 1/4 wave, wide spectrum bass trap out of the underside of the stairs. No space wasted. According to calculations, it should be about 20% effective at its two extremes - 30 Hz & 350 Hz, and up to around 60% effective for the frequencies between 45 Hz & 280 Hz.]
I like the floating cloud idea.