Ok guys, so I have a couple spaces where the space between the double walls gets fairly large:
one of them is 18" apart at the widest (7" at narrowest), and another is 3' at the widest.
(See the space between the control room and the shop,
and to the back right corner of control room in the pic below.)
This is measured from frame to frame, not sheetrock to sheetrock.
I've read that the airspace is important and effective, as well is insulation.
These walls are double walls with
5/8"-5/8"-frame-rockwool-airspace-rockwool-frame-1/2"-1/2"
So what would be most effective?
Leave the space dead air, or stuff it full of insulation?
Any suggestions?
NOTE: grey rectangle to right in pic is a (now) interior stone
retaining wall that comes up about chest high, with framing
to outside resting on that.
More Insulation vs. More Airspace
-
Audio Elements
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 1:29 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Contact:
-
knightfly
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6976
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:11 am
- Location: West Coast, USA
You'd get better isolation filling with unfaced fiberglass, but maybe not worth the cost/effort - with that wide a gap, you might see another 2-3 dB isolation by filling with insulation instead of just the stud frames . If you can afford it, I would go ahead and fill the cavity but don't use 3 PCF rigid for the entire cavity, only against the wallboard. The normal, fluffy fiberglass in UN-faced is as good or better for studio use once you have the rigid stuff against the wall panels... Steve
-
z60611
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 9:08 am
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Knightfly
In this thread you wrote
a) gypsum
b) woodstuds and 3pcf insulation
c) airgap with fluffy insulation
d) woodstuds and 3pcf insulation
e) gypsum
In this thread you wrote
But in this thread you wroteIf you can afford it, I would go ahead and fill the cavity but don't use 3 PCF rigid for the entire cavity, only against the wallboard. The normal, fluffy fiberglass in UN-faced is as good or better for studio use once you have the rigid stuff against the wall panels
Just so I'm clear, you're suggesting double stud walls be built as follows:it's better to use 703 or SAFB's on BOTH sides of a wall, partly for damping
a) gypsum
b) woodstuds and 3pcf insulation
c) airgap with fluffy insulation
d) woodstuds and 3pcf insulation
e) gypsum
-
knightfly
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6976
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:11 am
- Location: West Coast, USA
Right - couldn't have put it more succinctly...
Just so you know to be at least slightly wary - this is a "gut feel" thing on my part, based on USG's recommendation for 2.5 PCF being best for music walls, their comments about lighter insulation being better for bass TL, the cost of a foot or two of ALL 703, the thought that VARYING insulation density in a wall seems like it should "confuse" the sound more
, the knowledge that a light pressure against centers of wall panels reduces ringing, and the IRC wall document (linked here by Andre I think, sorry I don't have time to look - it's IRC-761, or something like that) , and probably a few dozen OTHER things my brain has absorbed in the last 20 years or so -
Bottom line is, YMMV - but this is, at this point in time, the way I intend to build most of the walls in my next facility... Steve
Just so you know to be at least slightly wary - this is a "gut feel" thing on my part, based on USG's recommendation for 2.5 PCF being best for music walls, their comments about lighter insulation being better for bass TL, the cost of a foot or two of ALL 703, the thought that VARYING insulation density in a wall seems like it should "confuse" the sound more
Bottom line is, YMMV - but this is, at this point in time, the way I intend to build most of the walls in my next facility... Steve
-
AVare
- Confused, but not senile yet
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Hanilton, Ontario, Canada
Here is the link to IR-761
http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/fulltext/ir761/
You may find this useful also. It is like "IR-761 in useable guidelines"
http://www.cmhc.ca/publications/en/rh-p ... -108-e.pdf
Enjoy!
Andre
http://irc.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/fulltext/ir761/
You may find this useful also. It is like "IR-761 in useable guidelines"
http://www.cmhc.ca/publications/en/rh-p ... -108-e.pdf
Enjoy!
Andre